Keyword Research for Ranking in Google

Keyword research is market research for the digital age. We have never had more data to focus tightly on the markets we are selling to. It is an essential precursor to building a web site and creating laser-targeted web pages properly to achieve success in either a Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) or online advertising campaign. Here I look at what is needed for SEO – Getting to the top of Google.

Keywords are words or groups of words which people use to search on Google and other search engines.

Google releases data to us through its Adwords Keyword Tool and we can find other useful data for SEO from a number of other sources, such as Majestic SEO for analysing links. However, specialist software (such as Market Samurai), expertise and an insight into the market targeted by a particular business are needed to show whether a web site and web page can achieve meaningful results in a search engine optimisation campaign.

There is a fine balance to be made between the amount of traffic, the competitiveness of the marketplace and a suitable budget.

On average, a top organic search listing will achieve 42% of the click-throughs for a search. The seventh listing will achieve 1%. You can see the gains can be impressive, but proper keyword research must be carried out.

As an example, Google tells us the UK monthly traffic flowing for the following search terms:

  • [Hat] 2,740,000
  • [Wedding hat] 40,500
  • [Black top hat] 1,300

Other research shows that [hat] is far too competitive a term to focus on as there is little chance of ranking for it without very deep pockets. It is probably only a suitable term for a very large retailer to target, being very generalist.

The competition for [wedding hat] is lower and a focused seo campaign for a specialist shop would be worthwhile.

Targeting [black top hat] would be relatively easy with a well designed web site and a good link building campaign. Even though the search numbers are far smaller, the searchers are very focused and traditional silk top hats can cost £2,000 in London’s West End. At the same time, there is high competition for advertising on the term, driving the Google Adwords price up to over £0.60 per click, meaning this would be an ideal term for a specialist retailer to focus their SEO efforts.

Here are just some of the factors a keyword researcher needs to look at to understand how successful a SEO campaign might be and how much might need to be spent on it:

  • The number of other websites containing the search term on their pages, in their URLs, meta titles and descriptions.
  • The number of links to competing pages and competing domains.
  • The authority of links to competing pages and what anchor text those links are using.
  • The PageRank of competing websites in the top search results.
  • The size of websites in the top search results.
  • The age of the domains ranking in the top search results.
  • The age and authority of the domain which will be the focus of the campaign.

A sensible piece of research will analyse tens of thousands of pieces of data for a small business; will generate previously unconsidered keywords; and will help a business focus. Software will help gather this data, but ultimately insight and common sense will make sense of it.

Without keyword research, it is impossible to run either a sensible or an economical search engine optimisation campaign. If you are building a new website, this should also be the starting point.

Charities and Online Giving: A Solution for Small Charities and PCCs

I recently needed a solution for a small charity to take credit card donations online simply and without technical know-how. This is the result of my research. The solution I found is www.charitygiving.co.uk.

If you find this information useful, please make a donation to Seaborough Church, Dorset, using this link: www.charitygiving.co.uk/seaboroughpcc.

Charity fundraising online has been revolutionised by large firms such as Just Giving, MissionFish and Virgin Money Giving. These firms have enabled hundreds of millions of pounds online to be given at a very low administrative cost to a charity.

However, for a charity which has a small income – for example less than £10,000 – they tend not to be the solution as the subscription or transaction fees are too big to justify the use of the service.

Small charities are generally poorly equipped to deal with credit card payments at all. Even setting up a PayPal account can be another tier of difficulty, before even thinking about Gift Aid.

For exempt charities, such as the Parochial Church Council I run, there is no charity registration number and you run into trouble with some of the online forms.

The solution I found is www.charitygiving.co.uk, run by a charity called The Dove Trust.

  • It is simple to sign up.
  • They process Gift Aid for you.
  • They give you an easy link to add to emails, web sites or Facebook Pages.
  • They pay you promptly.
  • They send you a paper statement in the post.

Charity Giving makes no charge for taking your payment if Gift Aid is not collected and a tiny charge of 3.1% to take a payment for you if they also process the Gift Aid. This is less than the charge many banks make for small businesses to process a credit card.

Here is a comparison of charges from their site (click on the image for more information):

Charity Giving Charges

The solution is simple to set up. There is no need for a web site, but if you do use a web site, they provide very simple code for a button or link. They provide a simple link for you to use in emails or elsewhere (for example on a Facebook Page).

I have tested this and not only is the site simple to use, but the staff are helpful and they make payments on time. You can set up a link or a donation button either as a charity or as an individual fundraiser.

Links to explore this further:

Charity Giving Home Page:
http://www.charitygiving.co.uk/

Charity Registration Page:
https://www.charitygiving.co.uk/charityaccount/register.asp

Registration Page for Individual Fundraising:
https://www.charitygiving.co.uk/fundraising/newpage.asp

Seaborough PCC fundraising link (Please donate!):
http://www.charitygiving.co.uk/seaboroughpcc

Do make a comment below if you have any other ideas about this.

Will Google Manually Review Your Site?

Everyone knows Google has a very complicated algorithm to assess the quality and relevance of a website for a particular search. Few people realise that Google also has a team of quality raters who are trained to manually review web pages.

In the last month or so, a recent copy of Google’s General Guidelines for rating URLs was inadvertently posted on the internet. Google’s lawyers have made pretty certain that this confidential document has been removed, but I had a chance to read the rather turgid 125 page document before it was taken down.

When are manual reviews likely to happen?

It seems certain that search queries and websites will have a manual review as a research exercise before an algorithmic change is discussed and applied. In addition, manual reviews are likely to be applied to websites where someone has submitted a spam request to Google. Google may then apply a manual penalty to the site or remove it from the index altogether until the problem is fixed, at which stage a reconsideration request can be made to Google to have the site re-indexed. This penalty may be due to the fact that page contains malware, or ‘may be spam’.

Google will also apply manual penalties to sites that are cheating the system, like the case of US company J C Penney, which was buying text links on a large scale reported here in the New York Times.

What is uncertain is whether Google are applying manual reviews to high ranking websites for high traffic keywords as a matter of course. They could be.

What do the Guidelines Say?

Google’s manual reviewers are rating a webpage according to the following scale of relevance:

Vital
Useful
Relevant
Slightly Relevant
Off-Topic or Useless
Unrateable

In addition, pages are flagged as:

Not Spam
Maybe Spam
Spam
Pornography
Malicious

Any flag other than ‘Not spam’ is going to cause problems for your rankings.

For some types of business and website owners, there is a very subjective difference between ‘not spam’ and ‘maybe spam’ especially with sites designed to earn advertising, commissions, or affiliate sites. There is a fine line between these categories whether the site is human reviewed or algorithmically ranked.

As ever, the key thing is to ensure your own website has high quality original content which is relevant and useful to the user. If in doubt, seek some advice.

What Does The Panda Like? Google Runs Its Quality Algorithm Again

The Panda algorithm is one way Google currently checks websites for quality.

It’s a relatively new feature of the way in which Google generates relevant search enquiries, which I first discussed back in February. Unlike much of Google’s algorithm, it is not calculated in real time or at the time of a search. The process is run across the whole of the search index at fairly regular intervals and so the consequences of the algorithm can be noticeable to a website on fairly fixed dates and can be seen in your analytics.

The aim of the algorithm is to assess the quality of a web site across its whole domain, rather than assessing the particular relevance of a web page to a particular search. What this quality represents may be controversial, especially given some of the results, but Google gives guidance about this here.

As well as all the usual markers like title and description tags, we can expect Google to be looking at the way you pages are structured in a Readers’ Digest type manner: Clear headings, sub-headings, bullet points etc. They’ll be looking at the incorporation of pictures and video. Parts of a large website which are poor in quality (say a scraped directory with copied content) may bring down the performance of the whole site. This algorithm is a fight about web spam as much as real quality.

As ever, the what really matters is that the content is well written, unique, trustworthy and interesting – across the whole site.

How do they do check that? We know one way is to use social signals from the page and site. If the page has lots of Facebook Likes , Twitter links and new Google + likes, then this is a real indicator that live humans, not just machines, think something of the site.

If you had asked Google whether social signals mattered to search results in November 2010, the answer would have been no. Since the spring of 2011, this does matter. It is extremely easy to add Like, Tweet and +1 buttons to a site, let alone other sharing buttons. Sophistication, for example use of Facebook’s Open Graph Protocols or Social Plugins can come later.

Are you doing this on your site? Why not add them today?

We know Panda updates have been run on approximately the following dates in the US. For the UK and non-English sites, the dates may be a little different. If your Analytics show a drop in traffic on or about these dates, it is worth having an expert check the site. Contact Steven Loveridge for help and advice.

Panda 1.0: 24 February 2011
Panda 2.0: 11 April 2011
Panda 2.1: 10 May 2011
Panda 2.2: 16 June 2011
Panda 2.3: 23 July 2011
Panda 2.4: 12 August 2011
Panda 2.5: 28 September 2011

We also know from a recent Tweet by Matt Cutts of Google that Panda 2.6 is likely to be run soon.

What is Quantitative Easing? Does it Just Refinance The Banks?

I hope someone can help with explaining exactly what quantitative easing is all about; and honestly say what the Bank of England really wants to achieve.

As I understand it, the formal line is the Bank of England (aka a Government Quango) is going to set about buying up gilts and other government assets from banks, in the hope that this can encourage further lending, so encouraging further consumer spending and helping avert a recession.

The claim is that this is not inflationary as eventually all the half a trillion pounds of Government assets (they’ll get there soon enough) they buy in assets will be sold back onto the market in future.

All this ready cash the big banks will then have will then be lent to businesses, homeowners, credit card punters and so forth and we’ll buy our way out of recession.

Clear so far? Not to me.

  1. First of all the banks are not lending to homeowners, small businesses or anyone else; and they are quite likely to just hoard this liquidity on the balance sheets anyway. If they do lend, it will be to safe blue chip companies.
  2. Second, Big Dave Cameron has just told us all to pay off our credit card debt and stop spending.
  3. Thirdly, Europe is about to be bust and the banks are going to be told to recapitalise even further.
  4. Fourthly, Big Merv King is talking down the economy so much, everyone will need to turn to prozac. Moreover, he is also saying small business does not matter as it is such a small part of the economy.

So is this just another recapitalisation of the banks?

Possibly. I am not a conspiracy theorist, mostly as Government and the Corporations can’t run a piss up in a brewery, let alone a complex financial scam.

My take on this is the following:

  • I think quantitative easing may save some banks again.
  • I think that consumer spending and the economy will not be helped by it at all.
  • I think it will be inflationary.

As a consequence savers (mostly the old) will suffer badly, but those of us with mortgages and ongoing liquidity may benefit in the long run, as our lending shrinks in real terms. Most of all, the Government’s lending will shrink in real terms as well and this will enable the borrowing cycle to continue.

Sadly I do not that that small, medium or bug business will ultimately benefit like this, especially if we continue to over-regulate employing people and running a business; and if we over-regulate the bankers as well.

In the mean time, with precious few other tools in the economists’ armoury, how is our economy going to thrive? Is this the right thing to try anyway, notwithstanding all of the above?

What does anyone else think?

Next Page »